Kategorie: NRW

“It is shocking if true that URENCO and the Federal Government have no problem with supporting the US nuclear weapons programme through enriched uranium from URENCO’s civilian uranium factories for producing tritium. This would clearly cross the already-thin line between military and civilian nuclear use. This must not happen under any circumstances,” states Hubertus Zdebel, spokesman for the phase-out of nuclear power for The Left Party parliamentary group, in response to media reports (Tagesschau, see attachment) about the civilian uranium enricher URENCO. Zdebel has also initiated an oral question to the Federal Government.

• Thist article is first puplished in german on May, 11th, 2017) here: Atomwaffen USA: Militärisches Tritium mit Unterstützung von URENCO?. It is based on a story by the Journalist Jürgen Döschner on German Newsmagazin „Tagesschau„.
• See also the orign-story by Jürgen Döschner on Tagesschau in this translation:Controversial supplies – German uranium for US nuclear weapons?

According to the reports, URENCO would have no legal problems with supplying uranium for the production of tritium for use in American nuclear weapons. According to US government reports, this was the conclusion of a legal memorandum prepared by URENCO. According to the same source, the responsible supervisory body, known as the Joint Committee, which is made up of representatives of the governments of the Netherlands, the UK and Germany and monitors URENCO’s activities and is supposed to prevent improper military use, had no objections to this. Zdebel continues:

“We should be happy if the US government has not yet made use of URENCO’s offer. So that this does not change in light of the ‘looming crisis’ in US tritium production that has been mentioned in the US media or under the new President Trump, a clear message from the Federal Government is needed now: that it will not supply such materials under any circumstances. It must make this clear via the URENCO supervisory body, the Joint Committee, on which Germany is represented and has veto power.

A few days ago, I also submitted an interpellation on this topic to the Federal Government. The Federal Government must not play a game of hide and seek about this now. URENCO is playing with nuclear fire. We must not forget that the company itself is highly militarily charged because the centrifuges used to enrich uranium are inherently capable of producing weapons-grade uranium. That is why URENCO is strictly monitored by the countries of Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands. Against this backdrop, URENCO must not be permitted to support the US nuclear weapons programme, not even indirectly.

One must criticize the US as well, however: through the use of a commercial nuclear reactor – Watts Bar 1 in Spring City – for military purposes for tritium production, the US makes itself vulnerable in terms of international efforts to maintain the separation between civilian and military uses of nuclear energy. Germany must not additionally condone or tolerate this by supplying uranium via URENCO. Other countries could likewise get the idea of including their civilian nuclear reactors directly in their nuclear weapons plans.“

About the background and the US documents:

The United States’ nuclear weapons programme is facing a problem. Because the last of the US’s own uranium enrichment facilities was closed down a few years ago, it could suffer a future shortage of the tritium that is needed for warheads. At the beginning of March 2017, two US nuclear experts spoke of a “looming crisis” in tritium production in an article on the website defensenews. The article also mentions URENCO:
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/commentary-the-looming-crisis-for-us-tritium-production

• The tritium in nuclear warheads must be replaced regularly, as it has a half-life of just over 12 years. (Wikipedia)

The problem that tritium poses for the nuclear weapons programme has been under discussion in the US for some time. This is also related to the closure of the United States’ only uranium enrichment facility in 2013.

Tritium production with enriched uranium takes place in a normal nuclear reactor belonging to the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Currently, this is done at the Watts Bar 1 reactor. In the future, however, according to TVA, an additional block of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant is to be used to produce tritium.

To this end, special fuel elements are to be irradiated in a reactor for a period of 18 months, then transported for tritium extraction to the Savannah River Site, where the extraction takes place.

For now, the United States is still able to make do by processing remainders and blending surplus highly enriched uranium to generate fuel for use in the TVA reactor. But without its own enrichment facility, the United States can only keep producing tritium in the medium term if it makes use of uranium from “foreign” facilities.

URENCO, in which the two German nuclear energy companies E.on and RWE have a one-third share, alongside the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, is one such foreign supplier. Along with its uranium enrichment facilities in Almelo (Netherlands), Capenhurst (UK) and Gronau (Germany), URENCO operates an additional factory in Eunice, New Mexico.

Because URENCO’s enrichment technology is also inherently capable of producing weapons-grade uranium, URENCO is subject to strict security controls so that this does not happen. In the Treaty of Almelo, the three countries of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom stipulated that URENCO was permitted only to work for “peaceful” nuclear energy. Regarding the construction of a facility in the United States, this is also established in the Treaty of Washington between the three URENCO countries and the United States.

In an opinion article published on the website defensenews on 6 March, the American experts John R. Harvey and Franklin C. Miller (Harvey: Departments of Energy and Defence, Miller: Department of Defence and National Security Council (NSC)) report on the growing problem of supplying tritium to the US nuclear weapons programme. They write that URENCO was evidently prepared to provide enriched uranium for tritium production for the US nuclear weapons programme:

• “Failure to restore domestic enrichment by the early 2030s leaves only one alternative: use of foreign-origin LEU. But there are many drawbacks. Some exporting countries will not sell LEU for tritium production because agreements in place limit use solely for peaceful purposes. Earlier, an international consortium (URENCO) agreed to provide LEU for TVA reactors, whether tritium producing or not, but previous administrations rejected this on the grounds that it further weakened separation of national defence-related and commercial nuclear activities. And, to be clear, because nuclear weapons play such a critical role in US security, and the security extended to allies, our nation cannot rely on global markets, or other countries’ decisions, to provide means to ensure that security.“ Source: Commentary: The looming crisis for US tritium production, by: John R. Harvey and Franklin C. Miller, 6 March 2017, About the authors: http://www.defensenews.com/author/john-r-harvey-and-franklin-c-miller.

A 2014 report by the Department of Energy (https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666505.pdf or https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-123) states that URENCO apparently supplied TVA with enriched uranium for use in its nuclear reactors under contracts from the years 2006 and 2010. The documents do not state whether it was also used at Watts Bar 1.

According to the report, URENCO wrote a legal memorandum stating that it had concluded that supplying uranium in this manner was permissible for URENCO despite the existing control treaties. The Joint Committee, the URENCO supervisory body established through the Treaty of Almelo, was also reported to have agreed with this view in 2005. In this Joint Committee, the governments of the three countries of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom monitor adherence to the control agreements according to which URENCO is bound to exclusively civilian purposes.

Neither URENCO nor its three-country supervisory body had any objections to supplying uranium to TVA, given that – according to the DOE report – it was used in the TVA reactors first and foremost to generate electricity, and only incidentally to produce tritium.

• “DOE and Department of State officials have cited these US non-proliferation goals in response to questions about whether TVA could use LEU produced by URENCO LES for tritium production. Specifically, URENCO’s corporate position has been that the Washington Agreement, under which its uranium enrichment facility in the United States operates, does not restrict the use of its LEU for the production of tritium. In 2006 and 2010, URENCO LES entered into a contract with TVA to provide LEU for use in TVA’s commercial nuclear reactors. Because TVA produces tritium for NNSA in one of its nuclear reactors, URENCO LES evaluated the extent to which the Washington Agreement precludes the use of LEU produced with URENCO technology in TVA’s tritium-producing reactor. According to a URENCO legal memorandum, in a July 2005 meeting of the Joint Committee—the British-Dutch-German government body supervising company activities under the Treaty of Almelo—URENCO corporate management posited that providing LEU enriched by URENCO LES to TVA for use in any of its reactors was not in conflict with the Washington Agreement’s peaceful use provisions. As reported to company officials in the United States, the Joint Committee confirmed that the Washington Agreement’s provisions restrict special nuclear material produced by URENCO LES to peaceful purposes. According to URENCO’s legal memorandum, it was further discussed that URENCO LES’s LEU will be used by TVA principally to produce electricity and that, if used in TVA’s tritium producing reactor, the resulting tritium produced in that reactor is a by-product material and not a special nuclear material. According to senior URENCO officials, the Joint Committee further discussed the fact that TVA would primarily use URENCO LES’s LEU for the purpose of producing commercial power. According to company officials, the Joint Committee did not place restrictions on the URENCO LES’s contract with TVA and did not distinguish between TVA’s reactors that produce tritium and those that do not. Furthermore, according to TVA officials, URENCO has consistently informed TVA that it places no restrictions on TVA using URENCO LES’s LEU in its tritium-producing reactors.” (in: “DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Interagency Review Needed to Update US Position on Enriched Uranium That Can Be Used for Tritium Production”, October 2014, p. 30, https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666505.pdf or https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-123).

The Department of Energy did, however, state some reservations about the use of URENCO uranium in tritium production in reference to the blurring of civilian and military boundaries in nuclear energy use. In view of the available information, it is not clear at this point in time whether or not, under the aforementioned contracts, URENCO uranium was also used in TVA’s Watts Bar 1 reactor.

• Other sources also refer to the URENCO assessment, see here AtomInfo.RU from December 2014 (http://www.atominfo.ru/en/news4/d0302.htm): “The company made a corresponding analysis before the conclusion of contracts for the supply of the enriched uranium to the TVA plants. The documents available for auditors contain a clear conclusion – the LEU from URENCO USA can be used on any unit, operated by TVA, including the unit(s) where the tritium is produced.” In a report from November 2014, AtomInfo.RU also writes about the problems for the US that arise from the foreign facilities with AREVA, France and Australia, further aggravating the US’s tritium problems (http://www.atominfo.ru/en/news4/d0269.htm).
• In 2012, when the closure of the last US enrichment facility in Paducah had already been planned, experts explained the problems for the US nuclear weapons programme that would result from this closure in a paper to Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey (https://www.markey.senate.gov/): The Department of Energy “currently produces tritium by irradiating lithium-6 in the Watts Bar 1 commercial reactor (in Tennessee) and may expand the programme to the two-reactor Sequoyah nuclear plant (also in Tennessee) as well, both of which are owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). Because the tritium is to be used in nuclear weapons, the Watts Bar 1 and Sequoyah reactors may not be allowed to use fuel from foreign sources or even some domestic uranium.“ (https://www.markey.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CRSMarkeyMemo_TritiumFuelOptions_051512.pdf)
• Markey’s statement also refers to a URENCO contract with TVA: “Urenco has signed a contract with TVA to supply enrichment services from its New Mexico plant to the Watts Bar and Sequoyah reactors. This arrangement raised questions about whether the TVA plants could be used to make tritium for nuclear warheads while being fuelled by enriched uranium from Urenco. A 2008 legal memorandum to NNSA concluded that the Washington Agreement did not preclude such use of the Urenco-produced nuclear fuel, because tritium is not defined as special nuclear material, but rather as by-product material. A Joint Committee of the Urenco consortium, after being briefed on the issue at a 2005 meeting, did not object to the TVA contract.”

Harvey und Miller presented a task for the new Trump administration: “By the early 2030s, the viability of the entire US nuclear deterrent is at risk from an inability to produce tritium for nuclear warheads. The Trump administration will need to take action soon to manage this long-term problem.”

Does non-military URENCO support the production on Tritium for US-nucelar weapons? German Journalist Jürgen Döschner published an article on that question on May, 11th on  german TV-News „Tagesschau„. This is a translation on that story, with permission by the Author. Thanks for that.

• See also this article with the documents on that story by the geman MoP Hubertus Zdebel here: US nuclear weapons: Military tritium with support from URENCO?

(Tagesschau) Controversial supplies – German uranium for US nuclear weapons?

„The company URENCO, which has an office in Germany, supplies uranium – including to the United States. To date, this radioactive export has been used to generate electricity there. But Washington could also put the uranium to good use in its nuclear weapons.

by Jürgen Döschner, ARD energy expert

Wednesday, 10 December 2014: A truck of enriched uranium departs from the premises of URENCO, a company in Gronau, Westphalia. Its destination is an American fuel plant: WesDyne/Westinghouse in Columbia, South Carolina. In fact, this is nothing unusual. The United States, which operates some 100 nuclear reactors, is the leading customer of the Gronau office of URENCO. In 2016, some 440 tonnes of enriched uranium were delivered to the States – more than to all other customers combined, including Germany.

But the destination of that 10 December 2014 shipment was a special one: the fuel plant in Columbia is part of the US nuclear weapons programme. Along with normal fuel rods for commercial nuclear power plants, Westinghouse also manufactures special fuel rods for the production of tritium, which are known as Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rods, or TPBAR for short.

• What is tritium? Tritium is a radioactive gas that is required in all modern nuclear warheads to enhance their performance. Because of its short half-life of twelve years, almost six per cent of the tritium in the approximately 7000 nuclear warheads in the United States must be replaced each year.

Electricity for more than a million households

From Columbia, the TPBAR fuel rods are delivered by truck to the neighbouring state of Tennessee, to the Watts Bar 1 nuclear power plant in Spring City. The reactor with the special fuel rods produces electricity for more than a million households. And, thus far uniquely among reactors in the US, it also produces the tritium that is so important for nuclear weapons. It is paid for and strictly supervised by the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA), a sub-agency of the US Department of Energy.

It is unclear whether uranium from URENCO has been used in this process too. However, according to US Congress documents, as early as 2006 there were contracts between the URENCO branch in the United States and the nuclear power plant operator Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for supplying the Watts Bar and Sequoyah reactors.

Officially, the strict position of the US government has evidently hindered the use of URENCO uranium for the nuclear weapons programme to date. US law currently forbids the use of foreign materials or technologies in the military nuclear sector.

A thin line of separation from the military

But pressure on Washington to ease these regulations is growing: since 2013, the United States has no longer had its own uranium enrichment facility. At the same time, it has a growing need for tritium. Military experts warn of a “looming crisis for tritium production”, which they regard as a medium-term threat to the operational capability of US nuclear weapons. For that reason, in 2014 the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) called for a loosening of these strict regulations. The alternative would be for the US to develop and construct its own uranium enrichment, which would take a lot of time and even more money.

The example of tritium shows how thin the line is that is drawn between civilian and military use of nuclear power in numerous international agreements. URENCO was well aware of this, and in a 2005 legal memorandum questioned whether it would violate the current agreements if uranium from the US branch of URENCO were used to produce tritium for nuclear bombs. The memorandum concluded that no legal impediments were seen, as tritium was ultimately just a “by-product” of the energy production process. This assessment was unanimously approved by the highest URENCO supervisory body, which includes a representative of the Federal Government.

Debate over legality – „confidential“

The Federal Economic Affairs Ministry responded reticently to the question of whether this assessment still holds true today. „The meetings and documents of the Joint Committee are confidential, such that I cannot state any position on them”, a Ministry spokeswoman responded in writing.

Speaking with the radio broadcaster WDR, Hubertus Zdebel (The Left Party), a Member of the Bundestag from Münster and a member of the Committee on Nuclear Safety, called upon the Federal Government to take a clear position that uranium will never be supplied to the US nuclear weapons programme. Providing such supplies would clearly cross the thin line between military and civilian uses of nuclear energy.

Thus far, the management of URENCO has not responded to questions from WDR.“

Update: Der Text ist im deutschen Original inzwischen nicht mehr auf tagesschau.de verfügbar. Hier die Rückübersetzung des obigen Textes ins Deutsche:

(Tagesschau) Umstrittene Lieferungen – Deutsches Uran für US-Atomwaffen?

„Das in Deutschland ansässige Unternehmen URENCO liefert Uran – auch in die USA. Bisher wurde dieser radioaktive Export zur Stromerzeugung genutzt. Aber Washington könnte auch das Uran in seinen Atomwaffen gut einsetzen.

von Jürgen Döschner, ARD-Energieexperte

Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014: Ein LKW mit angereichertem Uran verlässt das Gelände von URENCO, einem Unternehmen im westfälischen Gronau. Ziel ist ein amerikanisches Kraftstoffwerk: WesDyne/Westinghouse in Columbia, South Carolina. Tatsächlich ist das nichts Ungewöhnliches. Die Vereinigten Staaten, die rund 100 Kernreaktoren betreiben, sind der Hauptkunde des Gronauer Büros von URENCO. Im Jahr 2016 wurden rund 440 Tonnen angereichertes Uran in die Staaten geliefert – mehr als an alle anderen Kunden zusammen, einschließlich Deutschland.

Aber der Bestimmungsort dieser Sendung vom 10. Dezember 2014 war ein besonderer: Die Brennstoffanlage in Kolumbien ist Teil des US-Atomwaffenprogramms. Neben den normalen Brennstäben für kommerzielle Kernkraftwerke stellt Westinghouse auch spezielle Brennstäbe für die Herstellung von Tritium her, die als Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rods, kurz TPBAR, bezeichnet werden.

Was ist Tritium? Tritium ist ein radioaktives Gas, das in allen modernen nuklearen Sprengköpfen benötigt wird, um ihre Leistung zu verbessern. Aufgrund der kurzen Halbwertszeit von zwölf Jahren müssen jedes Jahr fast sechs Prozent des Tritiums in den rund 7000 nuklearen Sprengköpfen in den Vereinigten Staaten ersetzt werden.

Strom für mehr als eine Million Haushalte

Von Kolumbien aus werden die TPBAR-Brennstäbe per LKW in den Nachbarstaat Tennessee und zum Kernkraftwerk Watts Bar 1 in Spring City geliefert. Der Reaktor mit den speziellen Brennstäben produziert Strom für mehr als eine Million Haushalte. Und, bisher einzigartig unter den Reaktoren in den USA, produziert sie auch das für Atomwaffen so wichtige Tritium. Sie wird von der National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA), einer Unterbehörde des US-Energieministeriums, bezahlt und streng überwacht.

Es ist unklar, ob auch in diesem Prozess Uran aus URENCO verwendet wurde. Allerdings gab es nach Unterlagen des US-Kongresses bereits 2006 Verträge zwischen der URENCO-Niederlassung in den USA und dem Kernkraftwerksbetreiber Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) über die Lieferung der Reaktoren Watts Bar und Sequoyah.

Offiziell hat die strenge Haltung der US-Regierung offensichtlich die Verwendung von URENCO-Uran für das bisherige Atomwaffenprogramm behindert. Das US-Gesetz verbietet derzeit den Einsatz von Fremdmaterialien oder -technologien im militärischen Nuklearbereich.

Eine dünne Linie der Trennung vom Militär

Aber der Druck auf Washington, diese Vorschriften zu lockern, wächst: Seit 2013 verfügen die Vereinigten Staaten nicht mehr über eine eigene Urananreicherungsanlage. Gleichzeitig hat es einen wachsenden Bedarf an Tritium. Militärexperten warnen vor einer „drohenden Krise der Tritiumproduktion“, die sie als mittelfristige Bedrohung für die Einsatzfähigkeit von US-Atomwaffen ansehen. Aus diesem Grund forderte das US Government Accountability Office (GAO) im Jahr 2014 eine Lockerung dieser strengen Vorschriften. Die Alternative wäre, dass die USA eine eigene Urananreicherung entwickeln und bauen, was viel Zeit und noch mehr Geld kosten würde.

Das Beispiel Tritium zeigt, wie dünn die Grenze ist, die in zahlreichen internationalen Abkommen zwischen ziviler und militärischer Nutzung der Kernenergie gezogen wird. URENCO war sich dessen bewusst, und in einem juristischen Memorandum von 2005 wurde in Frage gestellt, ob es gegen die geltenden Vereinbarungen verstoßen würde, wenn Uran aus der US-Niederlassung von URENCO zur Herstellung von Tritium für Atombomben verwendet würde. Das Memorandum kam zu dem Schluss, dass keine rechtlichen Hindernisse zu erkennen sind, da Tritium letztlich nur ein „Nebenprodukt“ des Energieerzeugungsprozesses ist. Diese Bewertung wurde von der obersten URENCO-Aufsichtsbehörde, zu der auch ein Vertreter der Bundesregierung gehört, einstimmig genehmigt.

Debatte über die Rechtmäßigkeit – „vertraulich“.

Auf die Frage, ob diese Einschätzung auch heute noch zutrifft, hat das Bundeswirtschaftsministerium zurückhaltend reagiert. „Die Sitzungen und Dokumente des Gemischten Ausschusses sind vertraulich, so dass ich dazu keine Stellungnahme abgeben kann“, antwortete eine Ministeriumssprecherin schriftlich.

Im Gespräch mit dem WDR forderte Hubertus Zdebel (The Left Party), Mitglied des Bundestages aus Münster und Mitglied des Ausschusses für nukleare Sicherheit, die Bundesregierung auf, eine klare Position zu beziehen, dass Uran nie an das US-Atomwaffenprogramm geliefert wird. Die Bereitstellung solcher Lieferungen würde die dünne Grenze zwischen militärischer und ziviler Nutzung der Kernenergie deutlich überschreiten.

Bislang hat das Management von URENCO nicht auf Fragen des WDR geantwortet.“

Übersetzt mit www.DeepL.com/Translator

„Radioaktivität macht nicht an Grenzen halt. Also ab in Kette, Tihange, Gronau und Lingen müssen endlich stillgelegt werden, bevor es zu spät ist!“ Mit diesen Worten ruft der Bundestagsabgeordnete und Sprecher für Atomausstieg der Fraktion DIE LINKE, Hubertus Zdebel, zur Teilnahme an der für den 25. Juni 2017 geplanten internationalen Menschenkette zwischen Tihange und Aachen auf.

• DIE LINKE fordert in einem Antrag (Drucksache Nr. 18/11596) ein Verbot von Ausfuhren für Uranbrennstoff aus den deutschen Atomfabriken in Gronau und Lingen
• Alle Infos über die Menschenkette Tihange – Aachen gibt es hier.

Für Zdebel ist klar: „Der weitere Betrieb maroden Reaktoren in Tihange ist ein Spiel mit dem atomaren Feuer. Die belgische Atomaufsicht muss endlich die Stilllegung mindestens des Blocks 2 anordnen, der mit seinen tausenden Rissen im Druckbehälter ein unkalkulierbares Risiko ist.

Die Bundesregierung muss den Druck für die Stilllegung von Tihange und auch Doel erhöhen. Dazu gehört, dass deutsche Atomfabriken nicht länger den Brennstoff für den Betrieb dieser AKWs liefern. Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für deutschen Uranbrennstoff in diese Anlagen muss Bundesumweltministerin Barbara Hendricks endlich stoppen.Ich hoffe, die vielen tausend Menschen, die sich an der geplanten 90 Km langen Menschenkette zwischen Tihange und Aachen beteiligen, werden dafür sorgen, dass Hendricks und die belgische Atomaufsicht endlich auch aktiv werden.“

Aktiv für den Atomaustieg:

• Bundesregierung kann und muss Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für Uranbrennstoff untersagen
• Nachgefragt: Noch mehr deutscher Uranbrennstoff für Tihange?
• Bundestagsdebatte Tihange und Atomgefahren: Bundesregierung will Uranexporte aus Deutschland für marode Atomreaktoren nicht stoppen

Mit einer Kleinen Anfrage wollen der Bundestagsabgeordnete Hubertus Zdebel und die Fraktion DIE LINKE von der Bundesregierung wissen, ob es weitere Lieferungen von Uranbrennstoff aus der Atomfabrik Lingen in die maroden belgischen Atommeiler geben wird? Zdebel und die LINKE fordern mit einem Bundestagsantrag ein Verbot derartiger Exporte. Zuletzt wurden 68 solcher Uranbrennelemente für den Einsatz im besonders gefährlichen Block 2 des AKW Tihange mit Zustimmung der Bundesregierung nach Belgien geliefert.

• Die Kleine Anfrage ist hier als PDF (die Antworten stehen noch aus). UPDATE: Die Antworten hier als PDF.
• DIE LINKE fordert in einem Antrag (Drucksache Nr. 18/11596) ein Verbot von Ausfuhren für Uranbrennstoff aus den deutschen Atomfabriken in Gronau und Lingen u.a. in das Risiko-AKW in Tihange im Nachbarland Belgien.

Hubertus Zdebel, Sprecher für Atomausstieg der Fraktion DIE LINKE: „Angesichts der enormen Risiken, mit denen der Betreib der maroden Meiler Marke Tihange 2 verbunden ist, muss und kann die Bundesregierung handeln, um die Brennstoff-Versorgung aus Deutschland für die besonders gefährlichen belgischen Atomreaktoren zu unterbinden. Ein schwerer Atomunfall in Tihange hätte verheerende Folgen auch für die dichtbesiedelte Region im Großraum Aachen und darüber hinaus. Deshalb gilt es zu handeln, bevor es zu spät ist.“

• Bundestagsdebatte Tihange und Atomgefahren: Bundesregierung will Uranexporte aus Deutschland für marode Atomreaktoren nicht stoppen

In einem Rechtsgutachten im Auftrag der internationalen Ärzteorganisation IPPNW hat die Anwältin Cornelia Ziehm auf die Möglichkeiten hingewiesen, die das Bundesumweltministerium (BMUB) bzw. das Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA) hat, die Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für die Uranlieferungen aus Lingen (und Gronau) nach Belgien zu untersagen.

• Siehe dazu auch hier bei der IPPNW: Neue Stellungnahme: Der Weg zum Exportstopp ist frei!

Ausdrücklich widerspricht die Anwältin auch einem Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesumweltministeriums, in dem sich das Ministerium bescheinigen lässt, nicht handeln zu können. Auch Wolfgang Renneberg, ehemaliger Abteilungsleiter der Atomaufsicht im Bundesumweltministerium widerspricht dem BMUB. Zu der Studie im Auftrag des BMUB sagt er: “Aber auch aus rechtlicher und technischer Expertensicht geht die Bewertung des Gutachtens an der Wirklichkeit vorbei.” Renneberg ist der Auffassung, dass ein Exportverbot möglich ist (PDF, siehe auch hier).

Ziehm stellt mit Blick auf das Atomgesetz fest: „Zwingende Genehmigungsvoraussetzung ist es nach § 3 Abs. 3 Nr. 2 Atomgesetz, dass die auszuführenden Kernbrennstoffe nicht in einer die innere oder äußere Sicherheit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland gefährdenden Weise verwendet werden. Dabei werden grundsätzlich alle aus der „Anwendung von Kernenergie“ resultierenden Risiken erfasst. Eine Beschränkung auf eine militärische Perspektive gibt es nicht. Etwas anderes wäre auch mit den Zwecksetzungen des § 1 Atomgesetz, an denen § 3 Abs. 3 Nr. 2 Atomgesetz ausgerichtet ist, nicht vereinbar“ (vgl. Dr. Cornelia Ziehm, 2016: „Anordnung eines Exportstopps für Brennelemente aus der Brennelementefabrik Lingen in die Atomkraftwerke Doel (Belgien), Fessenheim und Cattenom (beide Frankreich)“, S. 1).